图书简介
This four-volume collection brings together the most important canonical and cutting-edge papers in Environmental Assessment. This is the first coherent academic reference work on the subject to date.
Volume I: Background and Context of Environmental Assessment 1. Caldwell, L.J., 1988. Environmental impact analysis (EIA): origins, evolution, and future directions. Review of Policy Research , 8 (1): 75?83. 2. Lee, N. and Walsh, F. 1992. Strategic environmental assessment: an overview, Project Appraisal , 7(3): 126?136. 3. Ortolano, L. and Shepherd, A. 1995. Environmental impact assessment: challenges and opportunities. Impact Assessment , 13 (1): 3?30. 4. Brown, A. L. and Th?rivel, R. 2000. Principles to guide the development of strategic environmental assessment methodology, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal , 18(3): 183-189. 5. Verheem, R.A.A. and Tonk, J.A.M.N. 2000. Strategic environmental assessment: One concept, multiple forms, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal , 18(3): 177-183. 6. Fischer, T.B. 2001. The practice of environmental assessment for transport and land use policies, plans and programmes, Impact Assessment & Project Appraisal , 19(1): 41-51. 7. Rajvanshi, A. 2001. Strategic environmental assessment of the India eco-development project: experiences, prospects and lessons learnt, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management , 3(3): 373-393. 8. Vanclay, F. 2004. The triple bottom line and impact assessment: How do TBL, EIA, SIA, SEA and EMS relate to each other, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management , 6(3): 265-288. 9. Alshuwaikhat, H. M. 2005. Strategic environmental assessment can help solve environmental impact assessment failures in developing countries, Environmental Impact Assessment Review , 25(4): 307-317. 10. Vidyarratne, H. 2006. EIA theories and practice: balancing conservation and development in Sri Lanka, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management , 8(2): 205-222. 11. Jay, S.; Jones, C; Slinn, P. and Wood, C. 2007. Environmental impact assessment, retrospect and prospect, Environmental Impact Assessment Review , 27(4): 287-300. 12. Hilding-Rydevik, T. and Bjarnad?ttir, H. 2007. Context awareness and sensitivity in SEA implementation, Environmental Impact Assessment Review , 27(7): 666-684. 13. Runhaar, H. and Driessen, P.P.J. 2007. What makes strategic environmental assessment successful environmental assessment? The role of context in the contribution of SEA to decision-making, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal , 25(1): 2-14. 14. Koivurova, T. 2008. Transboundary environmental assessment in the Arctic, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal , 26: 265-275. 15. Lam, K.-C.; Chen, J. D. and Wu, J. 2009. Strategic environmental assessment in China: Opportunities, issues and challenges, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 11(4): 369-385. 16. Sadler, B. 2011.Taking stock of SEA; in: Sadler B., Aschemann, R.; Dusik, J.; Fischer,T. B.; Partid?rio, M. and Verheem R. (eds). Handbook of Strategic Environmental Assessment, Earthscan, London: 1-18. 17. Fischer, T.B. and Onyango, V. 2012. SEA related research projects and journal articles: an overview of the past 20 years, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal , 30(4): 253-263. 18. Morgan, R. K. 2012. Environmental impact assessment: the state of the art, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal , 30(1): 5-14. Volume II: Environmental Assessment Theory 19. Bartlett, R.V. and Kurian, P.A. 1999. The theory of environmental impact assessment: implicit models of policy-making, Policy and Politics , 27 (4): 415?433. 20. Noble, B. 2000. Strategic environmental assessment: What is it? What makes it strategic? Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 2(2): 203?224 21. Clark, R. 2000. Making EIA count in decision making, in: Partidario, M. Perspectives on Strategic Environmental Assessment, Lewis Publishers: 15-28. 22. K?rn?v, L. and Thissen, W.A.H. 2000. Rationality in decision- and policy-making: Implications for strategic environmental assessment, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal , 18(3): 191?200. 23. Nielsson, M. N. and Dalkmann, H. 2001. Decision making and strategic environmental assessment, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management , 3(3): 305?328. 24. Dovers, S. 2002. Too deep and SEA? Strategic environmental assessment in the era of sustainability; in: Marsden, S. and Dovers, S. (eds.) SEA in Australasia, Sydney Place Federation Press: 24-46. 25. Fischer, T.B. 2003. Strategic environmental assessment in post-modern times, Environmental Impact Assessment Review , 23(2): 155?170. 26. Wilkins, H. 2003. The need for subjectivity in EIA: Discourse as a tool for sustainable development, Environmental Impact Assessment Review , 23(4): 401-414. 27. Cashmore, M. 2004. The role of science in environmental impact assessment: Process and procedure versus purpose in the development of theory, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24(3): 403-426. 28. Pope, J.; Annandale, D. and Morrison-Saunders, A. 2004. Conceptualising sustainability assessment, Environmental Impact Assessment Review , 24 (6): 595?616. 29. Morrison-Saunders, A. und Fischer, T.B. 2006. What is wrong with EIA and SEA anyway? - A Sceptic’s Perspective on Sustainability Assessment, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 8(1): 19-39. 30. Kidd, S. and Fischer, T.B. 2007. Towards sustainability: Is integrated appraisal a step in the right direction?, Environment and Planning C , 25(2): 233?249. 31. Sinclair, A.J., Diduck, A. and Fitzpatrick, P. 2008. Conceptualizing learning for sustainability through environmental assessment: Critical reflections on 15 years of research, Environmental Impact Assessment Review , 28: 415?428. 32. Retief, F. 2010. The evolution of environmental assessment debates: critical perspectives from South Africa, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management , 12 (4): 375?397. 33. Weston, J. 2010. EIA theories ? all Chinese whispers and no critical theory, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management , 12 (4): 357?374. 34. K?rn?v, L.; Lyhne, I.; Larsen, S. V. and Hansen, A. M. 2011. Change agents in the field of strategic environmental assessment ? what does it involve and what potential does it have for research and practice?, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 13(2): 203?228. 35. Richardson, T. and Cashmore, M. 2012. Power, knowledge and environmental assessment: the World Bank?s pursuit of ?good governance?, Journal of Political Power, 4(1): 105-125. 36. Tajima, R. and Fischer, T. B. 2013. Should different impact assessment instruments be integrated? Evidence from English spatial planning, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 41: 29-37. Volume III: Methodological aspects of Environmental Assessment 37. Weston, J. 2000. EIA, Decision-making Theory and Screening and Scoping in UK Practice, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43:2, 185-203. 38. Enserink, B. 2000. A quick scan for infrastructure planning: screening alternatives through interactive stakeholder analysis, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 18 (1): 15?22. 39. Tukker, A. 2000. Life cycle assessment as a tool in environmental impact assessment, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20(4): 435-456. 40. Marshall, R. 2001. Application of mitigation and its resolution within environmental impact assessment: An industrial perspective, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 19(3): 195?204. 41. Rossouw, N. 2003. A Review of Methods and Generic Criteria for Determining Impact Significance, African Journal of Environmental Assessment and Management, 6: 44-61. 42. Petts, J. 2003. Barriers to deliberative participation in EIA: learning from waste policies, plans and projects, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 5 (3): 269?293. 43. Stein, W.; Gerlach, J. and Tomlinson, P. 2004. SEA in transport planning in Germany; in: : Schmidt M, Jo?o E and Albrecht E (eds), Implementing Strategic Environmental Assessment, Springer-Verlag: 585-597. 44. Treweek, J.; Th?rivel, R .; Thompson, S. and Slater, M. 2005. Principles for the use of strategic environmental assessment as a tool for promoting the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 7 (2): 173-199. 45. Partid?rio M. R. and Arts, J. 2005. Exploring the concept of strategic environmental assessment follow-up, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 23(3): 246-257. 46. Hacking, T. and Guthrie, P. 2006. Sustainable development objectives in impact assessment: Why are they needed and where do they come from? Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 8(3): 341-371. 47. Duinker, P.N. and Greig, L.A. 2007. Scenario analysis in environmental impact assessment: improving explorations of the future, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27(3): 206-219. 48.Gunn, J. H. and Noble, B. F. 2009. Integrating cumulative effects in regional strategic environmental assessment frameworks: Lessons from practice, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 11(3): 267-290. 49. Pinho, P.; McCallum, S.; and Santos Cruz, S. 2010. A critical appraisal of EIA screening practice in EU Member States, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 28 (2): 91?107. 50. Nadeem, O. and Fischer, T.B. 2011. ’An Evaluation Framework for Effective Public Participation in EIA in Pakistan’ , Environmental Impact Assessment Review , 31(1): 36-47. 51. Gonz?lez Del Campo, A. 2012. GIS in environmental assessment ? a review of current issues and future needs, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 14(1): 1250007. 52. Noble, B. F.; Gunn, J. and Martin, J.2012. Survey of current methods and guidance for strategic environmental assessment, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30(3): 139-147. 53. Fischer, T. B. 2012. Identifying shortcomings of SEA practice, Town and Country Planning 81 (6): 281-286. Volume IV: Environmental Assessment effectiveness 54. Ten Heuvelhof, E. and Nauta, C. 1997. The effects of environmental impact assessment in the Netherlands, Project Appraisal, 12(1), 25?30. 55. Marsden, S. 1998. Importance of Context in measuring the effectiveness of strategic environmental assessment, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 16(4): 255-266. 56. Emmelin, L. 1998. Evaluating environmental impact assessment systems?Part 1: theoretical and methodological considerations. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 15: 129?148. 57. Emmelin, L. 1998. Evaluating environmental impact assessment systems?Part 2: Professional Culture as an aid in understanding implementation. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 15: 187-209. 58. Wood, C. 1999. Comparative evaluation of environmental impact assessment systems, in: Petts, J. Handbook of EIA: Volume 2: Impact and Limitations, Wiley, 10-34. 59. Glasson, J. 1999. The First 10 Years of UK EIA System: Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats, Planning Theory and Practice, 14(3): 363?375. 60. Fischer, T.B. 2002. SEA performance criteria ? the same requirements for every assessment? Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 4(1): 83-99. 61. Cashmore, M.; Gwilliam, R.; Morgan, R.; Cobb, D. and Bond, A. 2004. The interminable issue of effectiveness: substantive purposes, outcomes and research challenges in the advancement of environmental impact assessment theory, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 22 (4): 295?310. 62. Ortolano, L. and May, C. L. 2004. Appraising effects of mitigation measures: the Grand Coulee Dam?s Impacts on Fisheries; in: Arts, J. and Morrison-Saunders, A. (eds.). Follow-up in Environmental Assessment, Earthscan, London: 97-117. 63. Fischer, T.B. and Gazzola, P. 2006. SEA good practice elements and performance criteria ? equally valid in all countries? ? the case of Italy, Environment Impact Assessment Review, 26(4): 396?409. 64. Retief, F. 2007. Effectiveness of strategic environmental assessment in South Africa, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management,9(1):38-101. 65. Runhaar, H.A.C. and Driessen, P.P.J. 2007. What makes strategic environmental assessment successful environmental assessment?, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 25(1): 2?14. 66. Spaling, H. and Vroom, B. 2007. Environmental assessment after the 2004 tsunami: a case study, lessons and prospects, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 25: 43-52. 67. Bina, O. 2008. Context and systems: thinking more broadly about effectiveness in strategic environmental assessment in China, Environmental Management, 42: 717-733. 68. Elling, B., 2009. Rationality and effectiveness: does EIA/SEA treat them as synonyms?, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 27 (2): 121?131. 69. Jha-Thakur, U.; Gazzola, P.; Peel, D.; Fischer, T.B. and Kidd, S. 2009. Effectiveness of strategic environmental assessment ? the significance of learning, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 27(2): 133?144. 70. Stoeglehner, G.; Brown, A.L. and K?rn?v, L.B. 2009. SEA and planning: \"ownership\" of strategic environmental assessment by the planners is the key to its effectiveness, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 27(2): 111?120. 71. Arts, J.; Runhaar, H.; Fischer, T.B.; Jha-Thakur, U.; van Laerhoven, F.; Driessen, P. and Onyango, V. 2012. The Effectiveness of EIA as an Instrument for Environmental Governance ? A Comparison of the Netherlands and the UK, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 14(4): 1250025. 72. Tajima, R.; Gore, T. and Fischer, T. B. 2014. Policy integration between Environmental Assessment and Disaster Management, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 16(3): 450028
Trade Policy 买家须知
- 关于产品:
- ● 正版保障:本网站隶属于中国国际图书贸易集团公司,确保所有图书都是100%正版。
- ● 环保纸张:进口图书大多使用的都是环保轻型张,颜色偏黄,重量比较轻。
- ● 毛边版:即书翻页的地方,故意做成了参差不齐的样子,一般为精装版,更具收藏价值。
关于退换货:
- 由于预订产品的特殊性,采购订单正式发订后,买方不得无故取消全部或部分产品的订购。
- 由于进口图书的特殊性,发生以下情况的,请直接拒收货物,由快递返回:
- ● 外包装破损/发错货/少发货/图书外观破损/图书配件不全(例如:光盘等)
并请在工作日通过电话400-008-1110联系我们。
- 签收后,如发生以下情况,请在签收后的5个工作日内联系客服办理退换货:
- ● 缺页/错页/错印/脱线
关于发货时间:
- 一般情况下:
- ●【现货】 下单后48小时内由北京(库房)发出快递。
- ●【预订】【预售】下单后国外发货,到货时间预计5-8周左右,店铺默认中通快递,如需顺丰快递邮费到付。
- ● 需要开具发票的客户,发货时间可能在上述基础上再延后1-2个工作日(紧急发票需求,请联系010-68433105/3213);
- ● 如遇其他特殊原因,对发货时间有影响的,我们会第一时间在网站公告,敬请留意。
关于到货时间:
- 由于进口图书入境入库后,都是委托第三方快递发货,所以我们只能保证在规定时间内发出,但无法为您保证确切的到货时间。
- ● 主要城市一般2-4天
- ● 偏远地区一般4-7天
关于接听咨询电话的时间:
- 010-68433105/3213正常接听咨询电话的时间为:周一至周五上午8:30~下午5:00,周六、日及法定节假日休息,将无法接听来电,敬请谅解。
- 其它时间您也可以通过邮件联系我们:customer@readgo.cn,工作日会优先处理。
关于快递:
- ● 已付款订单:主要由中通、宅急送负责派送,订单进度查询请拨打010-68433105/3213。
本书暂无推荐
本书暂无推荐